Finally! When looking for an entry that could relate to Quickness I immediately went to the chapter on Time & Motion thinking that surely, I could find something that related to time… and motion. But nothing really jumped out of the page at me. I really played around with the idea of doing something relating to musical notes but I decided against it. Then as I was flipping through, I saw the Design Project for Typographic Layers:
Typographic Layers In everday life as in films and animations, multiple stories can unfold simultaneously. A person can talk on the phone while folding the laundry and hearing a song in the background. In films, characters often carry on a conversation while performing an action.
This typographic exercise presents three narratives taking place during a two minute period: a news story broadcast on a radio, a conversation between a married couple, and the preparation of a pot of coffee. Typography, icons, lines, and other elements are used to present the three narratives within a shared space. The end result can be obvious or poetic. Whether the final piece is an easy-to-follow transcription or a painterly depiction, it is made up of narrative elements that define distinct layers of visual channels
Let’s backtrack.
In Calvino’s memo on Quickness he tells a story from one of Boccaccio’s novellas. It’s about a man who is telling a story to a woman he is escorting. He’s trying to tell the story well but he’s doing a terrible job; he forgets events, the details and overall he has no rhythm. The mistress gets tired of his story and says “Sir, this horse of yours has too hard a trot, and I pray you to set me on my feet again.” Essentially, she was saying that his storytelling skills were terrible and she would prefer it if he would just stop trying. His story was bad because he didn’t have the quality of Quickness.
Now to the graphic pictured above.
I think that this graphic is a good representation of Calvino’s Quickness because it utilizes time in different manners. If I had to judge, I would say that the graphic in the bottom right hand corner, by Menon, is the best example of Quickness. It is obviously the most simplistic: it looks like Arial font with different colored highlighters which allows the reader to assume the sequence of events. It is the easiest to understand and the sequence of events isn’t convoluted like it is in the other examples. The only other contender would be the graphic in the top right hand corner, by Osmanof, but the lack of line breaks between the text on the right margin of the canvas makes it really difficult to understand. After reading the graphic in the bottom right hand corner, I have no desire to look for meaning in the other 3: they are examples of the horseman’s bad story telling skills.